Parenting Children with Special Needs Blog

09/10/07

If We Can’t Label It, How Do We Talk About It?

Posted by : Julie in Parenting Children with Special Needs Blog at 09:53 pm , 468 words, 131 views  
Categories: Disorders

This is the area of Kathie Snow’s People First presentation that I’m still mulling over. She challenged us to think well outside of the box to a day when labels such as “special needs” or “disabled” would no longer be used. Even the name of this blog, “Parenting Special Kids” would be problematic, as the use of “special” could invoke pity.

While I totally understand, now, that People First Language isn’t as much about being politically correct as it is about treating people with respect and dignity, I wonder at what point we are no longer to communicate because we no longer words that are generally believed not to have negative connotations to them.

What I’m trying to say is this. If words like “disabled”, “special needs” or even “challenging” are devaluing (and I do agree in some ways they are), then what other descriptors can we put in place instead that still allow us to communicate. The problem with our language is we want to use shorthand (to say it faster). So people with disabilities becomes “disabled people”. Children with autism become “autistic children”, etc. It’s convenience and speed that drive this usage.

SPONSOR

The other thing that Kathie made incredibly clear was that our children’s disabilities, especially their diagnoses were NOBODY’S BUSINESS. She drove home the point that our children’s privacy is critical and that we shouldn’t be sharing information about our children with total strangers. She also said that we just tell too many people information they don’t need to know. Who needs to know what’s going on with our kids? Doctors, insurance company…yes…but school personnel, strangers at the mall, friends at church or extended family members. Well, they need to know what my child NEEDS, but not what the diagnosis is.

On the surface, I couldn’t agree more. Then I remembered how much I was sharing with all of you. I have never met the vast majority of you. Yet, you know a great deal about me, but even more about LuLu. Kathie recommended that we only share about our child what our child feels comfortable with. So I thought I’d ask LuLu today how she felt about me talking about her in my blog nearly every day. At age 10, she has some concept of what I’m doing here. She told me she likes the blogs best where I do talk about what she does, especially the one recently where I scanned and inserted some of her artwork. Since then she’s drawn several pictures and proposed that I include them in my blogs. Perhaps I should take her up on illustrating some of my posts!

Related Blogs

Do Labels Really Matter?

What's Not in the DSM



Photo credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Nancy Spoolstra [Member] Email · http://attachment-disorder.adoptionblogs.com/
I am struggling with the same thing. We all are. I think it is clear we respect our kids and their struggles. We are sharing their story in our effort to make the world a better place and create support and services for families like ours.
PermalinkPermalink 09/10/07 @ 23:01
Comment from: Chromesthesia [Member] Email
I was just thinking about this very thing...
PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 04:10
Comment from: dubbamom [Member] Email
I'm a mom who has a child who has ______, _____, and _____.

I think there needs to be a balance between over use of labels and complete elimination of them.

It sounds like this speaker makes the assumption that everyone will view a child, called special needs, or XYZ, negatively. This hasn't been my experience. At times, it has worked to my advantage, because people have understood my child and his actions better.

At the same time, I think our most important job, is to advocate for our children, and make sure those working with our children, see the whole child.

It's a personal choice, as to who we share information about our children. Most parents of SN children, that I know, don't normally provide TMI, just what's necessary, in each situation, to benefit others and/or their child.

The speaker seemed a bit extreme to me, utopian rather than practical.

PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 06:45
Comment from: NCOZADD@aol.com [Member] Email
My daughter just started college, and is doing very well. Her main struggle is with math, something she has had a problem with forever, and was part of her IEP in high school. She emphatically does NOT want her IEP mentioned now, and we respect that. DD wants to seek other avenues of help, and do whatever she can on her own. As her parents, we respect that. DD is an adult now, and fully empowered to make her own choices.

When our "challenging" children were younger, Love Muffin and I (as well as the kids) decided what, when and how to share on a case by case basis. Now that they are adults, it has become even more so. There is some information that we simply do not share in a public forum, some not at all, and other things are public knowledge. It all goes to intent, and whether or not the information is shared for a specific, positive purpose.

When it comes to referring to our RADish, that is a much more kind, gentle and humourous term than what life was really like with him. What would a People First alternative be? :-)
PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 09:56
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
Julie,

Good morning!

Good food for thought. Yes, you are sharing details of LuLu's life. However, how many of your readers actually know who LuLu is? You've done a fine job of protecting her privacy.

So far as allowing the child to decide what info to share. On the surface, this seems like a good idea. But, can they really decide that? It is important for adults to take ownership of their decision of what to share. Parents are able to comprehend the idea that at some point, they will be accountable to their child for what/how those disclosures come around.

Lastly, these stories are intertwined with ours. We are living this story too. Our story is just as valid as our childrens.

It makes me feel cautious when "experts" attempt to put us parents into a box.

Amy
PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 10:05
Comment from: AngelaW [Member] Email
For me at least... I solved my personal issue with the phrase "special needs", when I realized that all children have "special needs".

I think my daughter needs the labels (ADHD, dsylexia, dysgraphia, rote memory issues). And when I take away the label, I am doing a disservice to my child.

I am failing to give her feedback... to acknowledge that I see her struggles and issues too.

By having a label, we have a shot at finding help / theory / medication / support.

My daughter feels very secure in her self identify BECAUSE we acknowldge her struggles.

What has to change? How others think of disabilities/challenges.

And I have to keep advocating for my kiddo.
PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 12:23
Comment from: getting old [Member] Email
at this point in time I am really thinking of getting shirts made that say "my son, brother, I was locked in a room for 7 years by himself at his birth home" He has only been with me x number of years... thus why he is the way he is" and I am at the point in life I don't care who knows what about me....
I do try very hard to protect my daughters' privacy and let them tell their stories if they want

My brother got a great deal of help in college because of the IEP he had in highschool, and he also got help from Dept. of Rehab, etc...

and one thing that happened to me recent school years, I am a SpEd teacher... one parent refuses to let her child be known by a certain mental illness (which she clearly has) but embraces the bipolar dx (which is so popular around here right now, it can be anything)

I think dx give us stategies quickly, let us know how to respond.... not know why something is going on cause more trouble sometimes



PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 15:03
Comment from: nancyderen [Member] Email
A person can have a disorder that needs labelling, but that does not mean the person herself needs to be labelled. My daughter is not her disability; she has a disabiilty (or two or three or four...)I think knowing a label for an issue can be a big relief for parents and kids because it provides an explanation and a feeling of not being alone- if it has a name, then I'm not the only one. Using labels and using Person First language are certainly not mutually exclusive. I believe strongly in Person First language. I think there is a big difference in calling a child "my daughter who has RAD" than "a RAD kid." Having a disorder and being a disorder are two different things. If the label is used to describe something that a kid has, then it is only describing one thing about the child, not who the child is. I also think that in blogs like these, the moms writing are doing so to do a public service, and I think should be able to use whatever language works for them. That may or may not be the same language that is used in "real life."
PermalinkPermalink 09/11/07 @ 16:20
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Parenting Children with Special Needs Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • np01
  • tania
  • Guest Users: 149